Article in Proceedings INPROC-2002-09

BibliographyJordan, Joachim; Kleinhans, Ulrich; Kulendik, Ottokar; Porscha, Jürgen; Pross, Alwin; Siebert, Reiner: Transparent and Flexible Cross-Organizational Workflows for Engineering Cooperations in Vehicle Development.
In: PDT Europe 2002.
University of Stuttgart, Faculty of Computer Science.
pp. 101-108, english.
Torino, Italy: Quality Marketing Services, Sandhurst, UK, May 7, 2002.
ISBN: 1 901782 06 9.
Article in Proceedings (Conference Paper).
CR-SchemaH.5.3 (Group and Organization Interfaces)
C.2.4 (Distributed Systems)
H.4.1 (Office Automation)
J.1 (Administration Data Processing)
J.2 (Physical Sciences and Engineering)
Keywordscross-organizational workflow management; engineering
Abstract

Engineering cooperations for vehicle development have proven to be successful not just to extend capacities but to profit from each other's specific know-how. Workflow management bears the potential to reduce cooperation barriers and costs. Within a cooperation project between DaimlerChrysler AG and EDAG, application scenarios have been defined to identify goals and benefits, to analyse important requirements, and to develop an IT solution concept, together with the University of Stuttgart.

Manufacturer and supplier both would profit from 1.) manageable automation of cross-organizational workflows, 2.) transparency of their partner's processes, 3.) flexibility of specifying own workflows autonomously, and 4.) integration of heterogeneous workflow management systems. For research, this field of application is challenging because existing approaches so far do not seem to be sufficient.

We describe a relevant scenario from an engineering cooperation project in detail. The resulting requirements do not only occur across companies, but in general even inside a single company. An appropriate solution should be able to deal with multiple interactions and some more complex dependencies between different workflows. It should be possible to make relevant data visible but keep irrelevant information private, and to support a late evolution of partner's workflows.

To address those requirements appropriately, our approach minimizes the specification agreed between the partners, therefore allowing to specify the associated partner's workflows in a decentralized, delayed manner. External workflow schemata can be used to give partners a view on each other's workflow. We use a peer-to-peer architecture in which complex dependencies between workflows are mapped onto simpler messages.

CopyrightQuality Marketing Services, Sandhurst, UK
Contactottokar.kulendik@informatik.uni-stuttgart.de
Department(s)University of Stuttgart, Institute of Parallel and Distributed High-Performance Systems, Distributed Systems
Project(s)COW
SFB 467 - C4
Entry dateMay 21, 2002
   Publ. Department   Publ. Institute   Publ. Computer Science