Artikel in Tagungsband INPROC-2015-52

Bibliograph.
Daten
Pado, Ulrike; Kiefer, Cornelia: Short Answer Grading: When Sorting Helps and When it Doesn’t.
In: Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet (Hrsg): Proceedings of the 4th workshop on NLP for Computer Assisted Language Learning, NODALIDA 2015.
Universität Stuttgart, Fakultät Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik.
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings, S. 42-50, englisch.
Wilna: LiU Electronic Press and ACL Anthology, Mai 2015.
ISBN: 978-91-7519-036-5.
Artikel in Tagungsband (Workshop-Beitrag).
CR-Klassif.J (Computer Applications)
Keywordsshort-answer grading; assisted grading; short-answer corpora
Kurzfassung

Automatic short-answer grading promises improved student feedback at reduced teacher effort both during and after in- struction. Automated grading is, how- ever, controversial in high-stakes testing and complex systems can be difficult to set up by non-experts, especially for fre- quently changing questions. We propose a versatile, domain-independent system that assists manual grading by pre-sorting an- swers according to their similarity to a ref- erence answer. We show near state-of- the-art performance on the task of auto- matically grading the answers from CREG (Meurers et al., 2011). To evaluate the grader assistance task, we present CSSAG (Computer Science Short Answers in Ger- man), a new corpus of German computer science questions answered by natives and highly-proficient non-natives. On this cor- pus, we demonstrate the positive influence of answer sorting on the slowest-graded, most complex-to-assess questions.

Abteilung(en)Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Parallele und Verteilte Systeme, Anwendersoftware
Eingabedatum16. Oktober 2015
   Publ. Institut   Publ. Informatik