Article in Proceedings INPROC-2015-52

BibliographyPado, Ulrike; Kiefer, Cornelia: Short Answer Grading: When Sorting Helps and When it Doesn’t.
In: Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet (ed.): Proceedings of the 4th workshop on NLP for Computer Assisted Language Learning, NODALIDA 2015.
University of Stuttgart, Faculty of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, and Information Technology.
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings, pp. 42-50, english.
Wilna: LiU Electronic Press and ACL Anthology, May 2015.
ISBN: 978-91-7519-036-5.
Article in Proceedings (Workshop Paper).
CR-SchemaJ (Computer Applications)
Keywordsshort-answer grading; assisted grading; short-answer corpora
Abstract

Automatic short-answer grading promises improved student feedback at reduced teacher effort both during and after in- struction. Automated grading is, how- ever, controversial in high-stakes testing and complex systems can be difficult to set up by non-experts, especially for fre- quently changing questions. We propose a versatile, domain-independent system that assists manual grading by pre-sorting an- swers according to their similarity to a ref- erence answer. We show near state-of- the-art performance on the task of auto- matically grading the answers from CREG (Meurers et al., 2011). To evaluate the grader assistance task, we present CSSAG (Computer Science Short Answers in Ger- man), a new corpus of German computer science questions answered by natives and highly-proficient non-natives. On this cor- pus, we demonstrate the positive influence of answer sorting on the slowest-graded, most complex-to-assess questions.

Department(s)University of Stuttgart, Institute of Parallel and Distributed Systems, Applications of Parallel and Distributed Systems
Entry dateOctober 16, 2015
   Publ. Department   Publ. Institute   Publ. Computer Science