@inproceedings {INPROC-2019-43,
author = {Lukas Reinfurt and Michael Falkenthal and Frank Leymann},
title = {{A Pattern-Based Method for Designing IoT Systems}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 13th Symposium and Summer School On Service-Oriented Computing (SummerSoc19)},
publisher = {IBM Research Division},
institution = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Fakult{\"a}t Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Germany},
pages = {1--27},
type = {Konferenz-Beitrag},
month = {September},
year = {2019},
keywords = {Pattern Languages; Design Patterns; Pattern-Based Method; Internet of Things; System Design},
language = {Englisch},
cr-category = {C.2.4 Distributed Systems,
D.2.11 Software Engineering Software Architectures},
department = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Institut f{\"u}r Architektur von Anwendungssystemen},
abstract = {The Internet of Things pattern language can be a valuable tool for
practitioners that want to design an IoT system. It offers them abstract proven
solutions based on existing real world uses and, thus, makes working with the
large amount of different devices, platforms, technologies, and standards in
the field of IoT more manageable. Practitioners can use the pattern language to
design an IoT system by starting with any pattern they deem suitable and then
by continuing to follow the links to related patterns defined by the pattern
language. However, when designing an IoT system, applying patterns in a certain
order can be beneficial. It allows practitioners to think through important
aspects of the system in the right order to minimize context switching and to
avoid having to change previous decisions. Thus, we introduce a pattern-based
method for designing IoT systems. It guides practitioners through the steps of
designing an IoT system in a sensible order. Based on answers to specific
questions asked in each step, it points practitioners to suitable patterns and
other helpful tools. The result is a pattern-annotated architecture diagram
that can be used as basis for further architecture refinement, as a guide for
finding existing solutions, and as input for communication with other involved
stakeholders.},
url = {http://www2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/cgi-bin/NCSTRL/NCSTRL_view.pl?id=INPROC-2019-43&engl=0}
}
@inproceedings {INPROC-2017-75,
author = {Lukas Reinfurt and Uwe Breitenb{\"u}cher and Michael Falkenthal and Paul Fremantle and Frank Leymann},
title = {{Internet of Things Security Patterns}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP '17)},
editor = {The Hillside Group},
address = {Vancouver},
publisher = {ACM},
institution = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Fakult{\"a}t Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Germany},
pages = {1--28},
type = {Konferenz-Beitrag},
month = {Oktober},
year = {2017},
isbn = {978-1-941652-06-0},
keywords = {Internet of Things; Design Patterns; Cyber-Physical Systems; Security; Privacy},
language = {Englisch},
cr-category = {C.2.4 Distributed Systems,
D.2.11 Software Engineering Software Architectures,
D.4.6 Operating Systems Security and Protection},
department = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Institut f{\"u}r Architektur von Anwendungssystemen},
abstract = {The Internet of Things (IoT) is growing, with new technologies, standards,
devices, platforms, and applications being constantly developed. This has lead
to a confusing solution landscape, which makes understanding the various
options and choosing a path between them difficult. In order to help with this
problem, we have collected IoT Patterns, which are textual descriptions of
common problems and their abstract solutions based on repeatedly found real
life examples. With this work, we add some security related IoT Patterns to
complement the already existing catalog of security patterns that can be
applied to IoT systems. The Trusted Communication Partner and Outbound-Only
Connection patterns decrease the attack surface of devices. The Permission
Control and Personal Zone Hub patterns give device owners control over what
happens with their devices and data. The Whitelist and Blacklist patterns
control access to and prevent abuse of resources.},
url = {http://www2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/cgi-bin/NCSTRL/NCSTRL_view.pl?id=INPROC-2017-75&engl=0}
}
@inproceedings {INPROC-2017-64,
author = {Lukas Reinfurt and Michael Falkenthal and Uwe Breitenb{\"u}cher and Frank Leymann},
title = {{Applying IoT Patterns to Smart Factory Systems}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11th Advanced Summer School on Service Oriented Computing},
publisher = {IBM Research Division},
institution = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Fakult{\"a}t Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Germany},
pages = {1--10},
type = {Konferenz-Beitrag},
month = {November},
year = {2017},
keywords = {Internet of Things; Architecture; Patterns; Industry 4.0; Smart Factory; Industrial Internet},
language = {Englisch},
cr-category = {D.2.13 Software Engineering Reusable Software,
K.6 Management of Computing and Information Systems},
department = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Institut f{\"u}r Architektur von Anwendungssystemen},
abstract = {Creating Internet of Things systems is a complex challenge as it involves both
software and hardware, and because it touches on constrained devices and
networks, storage, analytics, automation, and many other topics. This is
further complicated by the large number of available technologies and the
variety of different protocols and standards. To help with the ensuing
confusion, we presented Internet of Things Patterns in several categories, such
as device communication and management, energy supply types, and operation
modes. These patterns describe abstract solutions to common problems and can be
used to understand and design Internet of Things systems. In this paper, we
show that these patterns can be applied to Smart Factory systems, which is one
of the many domains where the Internet of Things is applicable.},
url = {http://www2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/cgi-bin/NCSTRL/NCSTRL_view.pl?id=INPROC-2017-64&engl=0}
}
@inproceedings {INPROC-2017-59,
author = {Lukas Reinfurt and Uwe Breitenb{\"u}cher and Michael Falkenthal and Frank Leymann and Andreas Riegg},
title = {{Internet of Things Patterns for Device Bootstrapping and Registration}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (EuroPLoP)},
editor = {ACM},
publisher = {ACM},
institution = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Fakult{\"a}t Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Germany},
pages = {1--27},
type = {Konferenz-Beitrag},
month = {November},
year = {2017},
keywords = {Internet of Things; Device; Bootstrapping; Registration},
language = {Englisch},
cr-category = {D.2.11 Software Engineering Software Architectures,
C.2.4 Distributed Systems},
department = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Institut f{\"u}r Architektur von Anwendungssystemen},
abstract = {All kinds of large and small organizations are trying to find their place in
the Internet of Things (IoT) space and keep expanding the portfolio of
connected devices, platforms, applications, and services. But for these
components to be able to communicate with each other they first have to be made
aware of other components, their capabilities, and possible communication
paths. Depending on the number and distribution of the devices this can become
a complicated task. Several solutions are available, but the large number of
existing and developing standards and technologies make selecting the right one
confusing at times. We collected proven solution descriptions to reoccurring
problems in the form of patterns to help Internet of Things architects and
developers understand, design, and build systems in this space. We present ten
new patterns which deal with initializing communication. Five of these patterns
are described in detail in this paper. The patterns FACTORY BOOTSTRAP,
MEDIUM-BASED BOOTSTRAP, and REMOTE BOOTSTRAP are used to bring information for
setting up communication onto the device. Devices can be registered using the
AUTOMATIC CLIENT-DRIVEN REGISTRATION, AUTOMATIC SERVER-DRIVEN REGISTRATION, or
MANUAL USER-DRIVEN REGISTRATION patterns. During this process, a SERVER-DRIVEN
MODEL, PRE-DEFINED DEVICE-DRIVEN MODEL, or DEVICE-DRIVEN MODEL is stored in a
DEVICE REGISTRY to digitally represent the device.},
url = {http://www2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/cgi-bin/NCSTRL/NCSTRL_view.pl?id=INPROC-2017-59&engl=0}
}
@inproceedings {INPROC-2017-15,
author = {Lukas Reinfurt and Uwe Breitenb{\"u}cher and Michael Falkenthal and Frank Leymann and Andreas Riegg},
title = {{Internet of Things Patterns for Devices}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Ninth international Conferences on Pervasive Patterns and Applications (PATTERNS)},
publisher = {Xpert Publishing Services},
institution = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Fakult{\"a}t Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Germany},
pages = {117--126},
type = {Konferenz-Beitrag},
month = {Februar},
year = {2017},
keywords = {Internet of Things; Design Patterns; Devices; Constraints},
language = {Englisch},
cr-category = {D.2.11 Software Engineering Software Architectures,
C.2.4 Distributed Systems},
department = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Institut f{\"u}r Architektur von Anwendungssystemen},
abstract = {Devices are an important part of the Internet of Things. They collect data from
their environment with sensors and, based on this data, also act on their
environment by using actuators. Many use cases require them to support
characteristics such as being cheap, light, small, mobile, energy efficient, or
autonomously powered. This creates constraints for available energy sources and
leads to different kinds of operating modes. Based on existing terminology and
additional examples, we describe these energy constraints and the operation
modes in the form of Patterns. These Patterns are interconnected with other
Patterns to form an Internet of Things Pattern Language that enables
practitioners to find and navigate through proven solutions for their problems
at hand.},
url = {http://www2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/cgi-bin/NCSTRL/NCSTRL_view.pl?id=INPROC-2017-15&engl=0}
}
@inproceedings {INPROC-2016-48,
author = {Jasmin Guth and Uwe Breitenb{\"u}cher and Michael Falkenthal and Frank Leymann and Lukas Reinfurt},
title = {{Comparison of IoT Platform Architectures: A Field Study based on a Reference Architecture}},
booktitle = {Cloudification of the Internet of Things (CIoT)},
publisher = {IEEE},
institution = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Fakult{\"a}t Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Germany},
pages = {1--6},
type = {Konferenz-Beitrag},
month = {November},
year = {2016},
doi = {10.1109/CIOT.2016.7872918},
keywords = {IoT; CPS; Reference Architecture; OpenMTC; FIWARE; SiteWhere; AWS IoT},
language = {Englisch},
cr-category = {C.3 Special-Purpose and Application-Based Systems,
D.2.11 Software Engineering Software Architectures},
department = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Institut f{\"u}r Architektur von Anwendungssystemen},
abstract = {The Internet of Things (IoT) is gaining increasing attention. The overall aim
is to interconnect the physical with the digital world. Therefore, the physical
world needs to be measured and translated into processible data. Further, data
has to be translated into commands to be executed by actuators. Due to the
growing awareness of IoT, the amount of offered IoT platforms rises as well.
The heterogeneity of IoT platforms is the consequence of multiple different
standards and approaches. This leads to problems of comprehension, which can
occur during the design up to the selection of an appropriate solution. We
tackle these issues by introducing an IoT reference architecture based on
several state-of-the-art IoT platforms. Furthermore, the reference architecture
is compared to three open-source and one proprietary IoT platform. The
comparison shows that the reference architecture provides a uniform basis to
understand, compare, and evaluate different IoT solutions. The considered
state-of-the-art IoT platforms are OpenMTC, FIWARE, Site-Where, and Amazon Web
Services IoT.},
url = {http://www2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/cgi-bin/NCSTRL/NCSTRL_view.pl?id=INPROC-2016-48&engl=0}
}
@inproceedings {INPROC-2016-46,
author = {Lukas Reinfurt and Uwe Breitenb{\"u}cher and Michael Falkenthal and Frank Leymann and Andreas Riegg},
title = {{Internet of Things Patterns}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (EuroPLoP)},
publisher = {ACM},
institution = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Fakult{\"a}t Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Germany},
pages = {1--21},
type = {Konferenz-Beitrag},
month = {Juli},
year = {2016},
keywords = {Internet of Things; Design Patterns; Cyber-Physical Systems},
language = {Englisch},
cr-category = {D.2.11 Software Engineering Software Architectures,
C.2.4 Distributed Systems},
department = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Institut f{\"u}r Architektur von Anwendungssystemen},
abstract = {The development of the Internet of Things is gaining more and more momentum.
Due to its widespread applicability, many different solutions have been created
in all kinds of areas and contexts. These include solutions for building
automation, industrial manufacturing, logistics and mobility, healthcare, or
public utilities, for private consumers, businesses, or government. These
solutions often have to deal with similar problems, for example, constrained
devices, intermittent connectivity, technological heterogeneity, or privacy and
security concerns. But the diversity makes it hard to grasp the underlying
principles, to compare different solutions, and to design an appropriate custom
implementation in the Internet of Things space. We investigated a large number
of production-ready Internet of Things offerings to extract recurring proven
solution principles into Patterns, of which five are presented in this paper.
These Patterns address several problems. DEVICE GATEWAY shows how to connect
devices to a network that do not support the network's technology. DEVICE
SHADOW explains how to interact with currently offline devices. With a RULES
ENGINE, you can create simple processing rules without programming. DEVICE
WAKEUP TRIGGER allows you to get a disconnected device to reconnect to a
network when needed. REMOTE LOCK AND WIPE can secure devices and their data in
case of loss.},
url = {http://www2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/cgi-bin/NCSTRL/NCSTRL_view.pl?id=INPROC-2016-46&engl=0}
}
@inproceedings {INPROC-2015-23,
author = {Karolina Vukojevic-Haupt and Florian Haupt and Frank Leymann and Lukas Reinfurt},
title = {{Bootstrapping Complex Workflow Middleware Systems into the Cloud}},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on e-Science},
publisher = {IEEE},
institution = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Fakult{\"a}t Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Germany},
pages = {126--135},
type = {Konferenz-Beitrag},
month = {September},
year = {2015},
doi = {10.1109/eScience.2015.69},
keywords = {Bootware; Cloud; Bootstrapping; On-demand Provisioning; Dynamic Provisioning; eScience; SOC; Automatic Provisioning; Automatic Deployment; Optimization; Integration},
language = {Englisch},
cr-category = {C.2.4 Distributed Systems,
D.2.11 Software Engineering Software Architectures},
department = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Institut f{\"u}r Architektur von Anwendungssystemen},
abstract = {The use of Cloud infrastructures together with provisioning technologies can be
successfully applied in scenarios where resources are only needed rarely and
irregularly, for example simulation workflows in the eScience domain. There has
already been proposed a solution for the on-demand provisioning of services
required by workflows, but how to automatically provision the needed workflow
middleware itself is still an open issue. Although many provisioning
technologies are available, it is currently not possible to use them in an
integrated, flexible and automated way. The main idea presented in this paper
is a multistep bootstrapping process, starting with a minimal local software
component and ending up with a complex workflow middleware running in the
Cloud. This minimal software component is called bootware. We define the key
requirements for the bootware, present its architecture and discuss the main
design decisions and how they fulfil the requirements. The bootware enables to
provision complex workflow middleware systems on-demand and automatically in
the Cloud and therefore reduces resource consumption and costs.},
url = {http://www2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/cgi-bin/NCSTRL/NCSTRL_view.pl?id=INPROC-2015-23&engl=0}
}
@article {ART-2019-23,
author = {Lukas Reinfurt and Michael Falkenthal and Frank Leymann},
title = {{Where to Begin - On Pattern Language Entry Points}},
journal = {SICS Software-Intensive Cyber-Physical Systems},
publisher = {Springer},
pages = {1--12},
type = {Artikel in Zeitschrift},
month = {August},
year = {2019},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-019-00417-6},
keywords = {Internet of Things; Pattern Languages; Entry Points},
language = {Englisch},
cr-category = {C.2.4 Distributed Systems,
D.2.11 Software Engineering Software Architectures,
F.2.2 Nonnumerical Algorithms and Problems,
G.2.2 Discrete Mathematics Graph Theory},
department = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Institut f{\"u}r Architektur von Anwendungssystemen},
abstract = {Pattern languages as tools for solving problems based on interconnected,
abstract, and proven solutions can offer valuable help to practitioners. But
there is always the question of where to begin when a pattern language should
be applied. Their authors often provide entry points, but these are usually
only useful if one starts completely from scratch or from a very specific
situation. When confronted with problems at hand, practitioners are often left
to find a suitable entry point themselves by reading through the whole pattern
language to find applicable patterns. To help with this problem, we present a
general approach and its formalization that provides entry points for any kind
of situation. Our general three step approach guides practitioners through
Situation Assessment, Treatment Selection, and Treatment Application in order
to find and apply a suitable pattern language for their specific problems. We
formalize all the parts involved and show that the facts collected during
Situation Assessment can be used to find a suitable entry point for a specific
situation. We also present an algorithm for finding these entry points.},
url = {http://www2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/cgi-bin/NCSTRL/NCSTRL_view.pl?id=ART-2019-23&engl=0}
}
@article {ART-2019-08,
author = {Lukas Reinfurt and Uwe Breitenb{\"u}cher and Michael Falkenthal and Frank Leymann and Andreas Riegg},
title = {{Internet of Things Patterns for Communication and Management}},
journal = {Transactions on Pattern Languages of Programming IV},
publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
pages = {139--182},
type = {Artikel in Zeitschrift},
month = {Februar},
year = {2019},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-14291-9_5},
keywords = {Internet of Things; Patterns; Embedded and cyber-physical systems; Device management},
language = {Englisch},
cr-category = {C.2.4 Distributed Systems,
D.2.11 Software Engineering Software Architectures},
department = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Institut f{\"u}r Architektur von Anwendungssystemen},
abstract = {The Internet of Things is gaining a foothold in many different areas and
industries. Though offerings vary in their scope and implementation, they often
have to deal with similar problems: Constrained devices and networks, a vast
amount of different vendors and technologies, security and privacy issues, etc.
Over time, similar solutions for these problems appear, but the amount of
available information makes it hard to identify the underlying principles. We
investigated a large number of Internet of Things solutions and extracted the
core principles into patterns. The eight patterns presented in this paper are:
DEVICE GATEWAY enables devices that do not support a networks technology to
connect to this network. DEVICE SHADOW allows other components to interact with
offline devices. RULES ENGINE enables non-programmers to create rules that
trigger actions. DEVICE WAKEUP TRIGGER informs sleeping devices that they
should wake up. REMOTE LOCK AND WIPE allows lost or stolen devices to be
secured. DELTA UPDATE only sends data that has changed since the last
communication. REMOTE DEVICE MANAGEMENT enables remote device management with a
client-server architecture. VISIBLE LIGHT COMMUNICATION uses existing lights to
send messages to other devices.},
url = {http://www2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/cgi-bin/NCSTRL/NCSTRL_view.pl?id=ART-2019-08&engl=0}
}
@article {ART-2017-16,
author = {Lukas Reinfurt and Uwe Breitenb{\"u}cher and Michael Falkenthal and Frank Leymann and Andreas Riegg},
title = {{Internet of Things Patterns for Devices: Powering, Operating, and Sensing}},
journal = {International Journal on Advances in Internet Technology},
publisher = {IARIA},
volume = {10},
number = {3\&4},
pages = {106--123},
type = {Artikel in Zeitschrift},
month = {Dezember},
year = {2017},
keywords = {Internet of Things; Patterns; Devices; Constraints; Energy Supply; Operation Mode; Sensing},
language = {Englisch},
cr-category = {D.2.11 Software Engineering Software Architectures,
C.2.4 Distributed Systems},
department = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Institut f{\"u}r Architektur von Anwendungssystemen},
abstract = {A central part of the Internet of Things are devices. By collecting data about
themselves and their environment using sensors, they provide the raw resources
for later analytics stages. Based on the results of these analytics they can
also act back on their environment through actuators. Depending on their use
case, these devices come in all shapes and sizes, are placed in various
environments, and often have to operate under constraints such as limited
access to energy or requirements for mobility. All these factors have an impact
on how they are supplied with energy, how they operate, and how they sense. In
this paper, we describe the resulting types of energy supplies, operating
modes, and sensing techniques as Internet of Things Patterns based on existing
terminology and known implementations. We show that these patterns are
interconnected with others and that they form the beginning of an Internet of
Things Pattern Language, which allows readers to find and navigate through
abstract solutions for often reoccurring problems.},
url = {http://www2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/cgi-bin/NCSTRL/NCSTRL_view.pl?id=ART-2017-16&engl=0}
}
@inbook {INBOOK-2018-01,
author = {Jasmin Guth and Uwe Breitenb{\"u}cher and Michael Falkenthal and Paul Fremantle and Oliver Kopp and Frank Leymann and Lukas Reinfurt},
title = {{A Detailed Analysis of IoT Platform Architectures: Concepts, Similarities, and Differences}},
series = {Internet of Everything: Algorithms, Methodologies, Technologies and Perspectives},
publisher = {Springer},
pages = {81--101},
type = {Beitrag in Buch},
month = {Januar},
year = {2018},
isbn = {10.1007/978-981-10-5861-5_4},
keywords = {Internet of Things; IoT; Platform; Reference Architecture; FIWARE; OpenMTC; SiteWhere; Webinos; AWS IoT; IBM Watson IoT Platform; Microsoft Azure IoT Hub},
language = {Englisch},
cr-category = {D.2.11 Software Engineering Software Architectures,
D.4.7 Operating Systems Organization and Design,
H.3.4 Information Storage and Retrieval Systems and Software},
department = {Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Institut f{\"u}r Parallele und Verteilte Systeme, Anwendersoftware;
Universit{\"a}t Stuttgart, Institut f{\"u}r Architektur von Anwendungssystemen},
abstract = {The IoT is gaining increasing attention. The overall aim is to interconnect the
physical with the digital world. Therefore, the physical world is measured by
sensors and translated into processible data, and data has to be translated
into commands to be executed by actuators. Due to the growing interest in IoT,
the number of platforms designed to support IoT has risen considerably. As a
result of different approaches, standards, and use cases, there is a wide
variety and heterogeneity of IoT platforms. This leads to difficulties in
comprehending, selecting, and using appropriate platforms. In this work, we
tackle these issues by conducting a detailed analysis of several
state-of-the-art IoT platforms in order to foster the understanding of the (i)
underlying concepts, (ii) similarities, and (iii) differences between them. We
show that the various components of the different platforms can be mapped to an
abstract reference architecture, and analyze the effectiveness of this mapping.},
url = {http://www2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/cgi-bin/NCSTRL/NCSTRL_view.pl?id=INBOOK-2018-01&engl=0}
}